Letters extra: pseudo objective assessment

27th July 2001 at 01:00

In your report on the testing of very young childrennbsp;("New tests could double reception teachers' workload" July 6) you say:

"Warwick University research ... found that teachers want one nationally-comparable assessment to use as evidence for threshold applications and inspection." Many early years teachers, reporting the tears of children who experience "failure" at the age of three would dissent.

Shouldn't the touchstone for any activity be the effect on the children? But in its report of the 90 baseline assessment schemes currently in use that is not even mentioned. Instead our energies are diverted in the pursuit of some pseudo "objective" system of measurement and for what? To ensure that teachers obtain a level of salary that ought to be theirs as a matter of course, and to act as insurance from attacks from inspectors.

What a perfect summary of the government's achievements in education.

Ruth Knox
Secretary, Liverpool National Union of Teachers

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today