Letters extra: pseudo objective assessment

27th July 2001 at 01:00

In your report on the testing of very young childrennbsp;("New tests could double reception teachers' workload" July 6) you say:

"Warwick University research ... found that teachers want one nationally-comparable assessment to use as evidence for threshold applications and inspection." Many early years teachers, reporting the tears of children who experience "failure" at the age of three would dissent.

Shouldn't the touchstone for any activity be the effect on the children? But in its report of the 90 baseline assessment schemes currently in use that is not even mentioned. Instead our energies are diverted in the pursuit of some pseudo "objective" system of measurement and for what? To ensure that teachers obtain a level of salary that ought to be theirs as a matter of course, and to act as insurance from attacks from inspectors.

What a perfect summary of the government's achievements in education.

Ruth Knox
Secretary, Liverpool National Union of Teachers

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now