Letters extra: Sir Jeremy's sophistry has a hollow sound

2nd April 2004 at 01:00

I was astonished by the lack of connected logic and the undeclared aims of Sir Jeremy Beecham's article ( TES, 20.02.04 ).

After the problems of recent years, it is now clear that national funding for schools will cut local bureaucracy and free up resources, save the time of heads and governors, remove uncertainty and establish transparency and fairness. It is 'simply incomprehensible' that anyone would oppose it.

The main part of the article, however, gave the game away. The anxiety of the Local Government Association is not about fair funding but about power.

Most schools would heartily endorse the idea of collaborative action and flexibility of funding to solve deeply ingrained problems and to serve children better; but they also want funding for their school to be fair, transparent and adequate. That is why Sir Jeremy's sophistry has a hollow sound and is ultimately unpersuasive.

Richard Bird
Principal
Casterton community college
Rutland

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now