Letters extra: Sir Jeremy's sophistry has a hollow sound

2nd April 2004 at 01:00

I was astonished by the lack of connected logic and the undeclared aims of Sir Jeremy Beecham's article ( TES, 20.02.04 ).

After the problems of recent years, it is now clear that national funding for schools will cut local bureaucracy and free up resources, save the time of heads and governors, remove uncertainty and establish transparency and fairness. It is 'simply incomprehensible' that anyone would oppose it.

The main part of the article, however, gave the game away. The anxiety of the Local Government Association is not about fair funding but about power.

Most schools would heartily endorse the idea of collaborative action and flexibility of funding to solve deeply ingrained problems and to serve children better; but they also want funding for their school to be fair, transparent and adequate. That is why Sir Jeremy's sophistry has a hollow sound and is ultimately unpersuasive.

Richard Bird
Casterton community college

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today