Letters extra: Weighting in vain?

17th October 2003 at 01:00

Harry Brighouse is right to arguenbsp;for a low income weighting to fund schools ( Tricks for social mobility, The TES , 3.10.03 ).

Moreover as Peter Wilby points out in the same edition, the result of affirmative action - he proposes a top universities' quota of places for schools in deprived areas - could be to leaven the socialnbsp; mixture of schools by atracting middle class parents.

The Netherlands, which has long had a weighting systemnbsp;for poor children and immigrant children,nbsp; shows that the funding advantage has to be significant to make a difference.nbsp;Researchers in New York State estimated a minimum of 10 per cent extra per pupil.

My guess, as an ex-local authority schools funding officer, is that it needs to be closer to 20 per cent. I reviewed these issues in a research paper for the North of England conference in 1997.

Martin Yarnit ,

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now