Letters that Liddell can't ignore

23rd October 1998 at 01:00
No sense on English

I am interested in HMI Ernie Spencer's reported assertion ("Is there anybody listening?", October 2) that Higher Still English is not intended to be assessed mechanically (we are required instead to make "professional judgments about key qualities in the students' work"), and his reference to the "complex psycho-linguistic skills" the learning and assessment of English involves.

It seems to me that it is precisely this fact that is at the root of the problems, particularly in view of the high proportion of internal assessment.

The problem is that a mechanical, pseudo-objective system of assessment, which may work fine in physics or maths, is being forcibly imposed on a subject where the responses and the criteria of assessment are both complex in themselves and contain a large element of subjectivity.

Facile, pseudo-scientific, single-sentence descriptors - the examiner's equivalent of soundbites - are simply not adequate to cover the range and complexity of acceptable responses, or to discriminate between the subtle shades of variation involved.

In their own mundane context, the words "strain, crack and sometimes break" under the burden of meaning they are required to support. This is not a sound basis for a consistent system of national assessment.

The term "instrument of assessment", used as a blanket term for all subjects, also has to win the prize for being one of the most dishonest and misleading metaphors to enter recent educational jargon. These "tests", far from being precision tools, are the equivalent of crude stone implements. Perhaps they should be renamed "implements of assessment", although this is an equally ugly phrase.

It is an easy matter to test whether a student is able unassisted to solve a quadratic equation. It is a far different matter to decide whether someone should be receiving a top grade B or a bottom grade A in Talk at Higher. Even Mr Spencer's professional judgment on this will inevitably be at variance with others equally qualified to judge. It is also quite impossible in such a case to check the accuracy of the judgment after the grade has been awarded. Hardly scientific.

Robert Bell

Stewarton Drive, Cambuslang

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today