Little demand for test re-marking

30th June 2000 at 01:00
LAST week's "exclusive" front-page story on test marks for key stage 2 English (TES, June 23) mischievously over-stated the scale of marking reviews.

Focusing on the number of schools which had appealed ignores the fact that, in most cases, the number of pupils involved was very tiny. The number whose levels were changed was even smaller.

A more accurate guide to the reliability of the tests is the review request data, published by Qualifications and Curriculum Authority in January as part of our annual reports on test standards.

The number of pupils involved in review requests was jst over 1 per cent of the cohort, and of these, just over half (0.62 per cent of the cohort) resulted in a level change.

The QCA's evaluation after the tests showed that three-quarters of teachers thought that the marking of KS2 tests was "good" or "very good".

However, as part of our quality control process, we did find it necessary to dismiss 31 English markers - around 1.5 per cent of the total. All of the scripts marked by those dismissed were re-marked.

Dr Nicholas Tate

Chief Executive

Qualifications amp; Curriculum Authority

Bolton Street


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today