Local majority loses its power

9th October 1998 at 01:00
I see that the proposal in the "fair funding" consultation paper for "majority voting" has gone.

This proposal represented a welcome, and indeed overdue, recognition that the collective wish of a local education community, arrived at by consensus, could determine, and enforce, mutual obligations in the common interest.

It appears that Government policy has been genetically modified and that fair funding itself has gone grant-maintained.

There is to be no such thing as a local education "good" which, no matter how overwhelming the majority in its favour, cannot be disaggregated to destruction.

On all sides of Government we are told that local communities are to be empowered; that they must make their own decisions; that they must seek their own salvation in collective responsibility, whether by devolution, in local partnerships of otherwise. But words and the deeds do not match; subsidiarity still stops at Westminster.

It seems that there is only one majority vote - that at Westminster- which binds all communities, irrespective of their needs or wishes, from the Thames to the Tees and from Pimlico to Peterlee.

Keith Mitchell. Director of education. County Hall. Durham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today