Loopy logic to make all schools specialist

2nd March 2001 at 00:00
David Jesson's argument that specialist schools are successful, so make all schools specialist, is outrageous and dangerous ("That specialist smile...", TES, February 16).

Where is the evidence that you can raise the number of specialist schools and still maintain improvements on a large scale? These schools can select pupils and have significantly more resources - both more important than a change of name or ethos.

Having more schools simply jump on the bandwagon is ot the way forward.

Also, is anyone considering the whole child and range of experiences rather than simply judging success by exam passes? Child-centred education seems to have been lost at the expense of the specialists' performance-led approach.

There is a big difference between education, education, education and performance, performance, performance. Can we at least have some debate?

David Spendlove Senior lecturer Liverpool John Moores University

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today