Lost boys and audit findings

16th February 2001 at 00:00
Your article ("Lost Boys", TES, January 19) on tuition for excluded pupils certainly generated quite a postbag (TES, February 2). The orginal article was based on the Audit Commission's local authority performance information.

Mick O'Brien from Bradford Council implies that the information on Bradford was wrong, but then quotes the hours of alternative tuition provided rather than - as the commission measures - the hours actually attended. We have a signed confirmation from Bradford Council that the information we publishe is correct.

Oliver Flavin made some odd criticisms of the performance measure we use.

We consulted widely on the indicator before we specified it and got overwhelming support - it has since been adopted by the Government as a best-value performance indicator.

The TES used the information to comment on education for excluded pupils, and that is in keeping with our aim of stimulating an informed public debate.

Steve Evans Head of performance information Audit Commission 1 Vincent Square London SW1


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now