Making up the script

11th March 2005 at 00:00
I recently attended a conference on modern languages organised by Scottish CILT (Centre for Information on Language Teaching).

The very high turn out of primary and secondary colleagues reflected a need for clarification and guidance in languages and, indeed, we did receive useful examples of pupils' work at 5-14. We were encouraged, rightly, to celebrate good work at these levels.

Unwittingly, however, the conference also testified to the confused state of affairs at national level regarding modern languages. The gloss put on her presentation by the attendant HMI could not conceal the chaos of modern language policy in the last 15 years.

The reality is that when it was realised that the Languages for All initiative of the 1990s had contributed to the decline of Higher languages, the new policy was to offer a 500-hour "entitlement" in one language, leading to certification.

When it was further realised that this made a farce of the previous policy of diversification of languages in S1, the new line, as promulgated by the HMI at the SCILT conference, is to "look at what the children can do in the foreign language" rather than obsessing over the number of hours, or the language studied etc.

This would be fine (although disingenuous) if said inspector had not also advised: "Let's not get bogged down in an argument about whether that piece of work is a D or an E". Oh really? And what about our school reports? Surely, we can expect more helpful support than that.

Much was made at the conference also of the fact that 84 per cent of S4 age pupils in Scotland achieve a Foundation level or above, compared to 50 per cent in England where languages for all is not a reality. No analysis of the quality of the English sample was made known, and there were gasps of horror from the audience on learning that one truly appalling writing performance (from a Scottish candidate) had been awarded a General award.

One has the distinct impression the script is being made up as we go along.

Pupils, parents and teachers surely deserve better from HMIE et al.

As experts in advising others on planning, quality assurance and consistency, could they perhaps be invited to look at their own?

Name and address supplied

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now