Many questions but few answers

1st June 2012 at 01:00

The discussions about special educational needs (SEN) reforms and the article concerning pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties ("SEN shake-up will be bad for behaviour, heads warn", 18 May) present more questions and few answers.

The destruction of the SEN statement of need along with its legal foundation only to be replaced by a single education, health and care plan is only that - a plan that offers the illusion of coherence and cooperation when frontline staff from all services are being systematically reduced.

Personalised budgets are another "smoke and mirrors" exercise and a method by which control and direction are deflected from central agencies. Local councils can publish details of support available for children and their families or carers, but I suspect it will be woefully thin in detail and application.

Dr Len Parkyn, Special needs teacher with 33 years' experience.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now