Meals are not the best measure

25th October 1996 at 01:00
I get fed up with the story reproduced by Michael Barber (TES, October 11). He believes a "huge range in performance among schools of similar types" is illustrated by the variation of GCSE scores between schools with over half of pupils on free school meals.

I know of no work which shows that the free school meals figure is a satisfactory measurement of the social factors related to poor academic performance. Most inner-city teachers know that it's all much more complicated. The only reason it's used is that it's the only measurement there is. It is intellectually indefensible and politically irresponsible to pretend we can make any statement about school performance using such figures.

No one denies these days that school makes a difference. The problem lies with those academics and politicians who want to deny that the social nature of the intake makes much more difference.

MARTIN JOHNSON National executive member National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers Wendle Court 131-137 Wandsworth Road London SW8

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today