Meat points

20th June 2003 at 01:00
In response to your arguments for eating meat (Teacher magazine, May 23), might I offer the following observations?

You suggest that some meat eaters do so because of the "need to feel aggressive"; try telling that to the courts. You say some eat meat for "cultural reasons"; but some cultures involve cannibalism. Our tooth structure? - it's omnivorous, not carnivorous, it gives us the choice to make moral choices, as does our brain. You say Vitamin B12 is "only available from natural sources"; the reality is that B12 is manufactured by micro-organisms, found in the guts of ruminants. These are easily cultured without using animals and B12 added to margarine etc.

The argument that meat "tastes good" is on a par with "I enjoy it".

Hedonism is no argument if no physiological justification can be found for killing animals - and you fail to provide it. Since the entire profession of academic nutritionists is agreed that we do not need to eat animal products to stay healthy, it follows that we should not kill animals for food; to do so is utterly philosophically flawed.

James Boyle

128 Eastwoodmains Road Glasgow

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now