21st May 2004 at 01:00
How much is the audience involved in the production of meaning from an image? An examination of the differences between what we and the Victorians might bring to bear on Whymper's image should highlight the contribution of the audience.

lBegin by asking: is the image intended as a purely objective, accurate depiction of what Whymper saw? If so, why did he include the three human figures? Examine the postures of each figure. What can you say about their responses to the fogbow? Is the artist perhaps guiding our response?

lThink about the social and emotional contexts in which the image was produced. Consider: Victorian religiosity; the romance and spirituality of mountaineering (read Longfellow's poem "Excelsior" at rpodisplaypoem1325.html); the recent deaths of members of Whymper's party.

lExamine the role of the media in disseminating stories about the Angel of Mons in the First World War. What led the contemporary audience to value the legend? Was it propaganda? Find the background at www.worldwar1.comheritage angel.htm.

For the story, go to www.aftermathww1.combowmen.asp.

For an account of its genesis go to www.aftermathww1.combowmint1.asp

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today