Members only?

16th June 2000 at 01:00
SHOULD the decision to strike a teacher off the professional register be solely a matter for elected teacher members of the General Teaching Council? Or should the council be able to co-opt non-members and non-teachers onto misconduct and competency panels?

On the Scottish GTC the decision to remove teacher status has long been taken by teachers' peers. But there are only 50,000 teachers in Scotland. If the 25 elected teachers of the English GTC are to remain practising teachers in touch with the values and views of their colleagues, there simply may not be eough of them to deal with every case arising among the 450,000 who teach south of the border.

There is also a case to be made for greater openness and public accountability. And a sprinkling of legal experience on the panels might mean greater fairness. But what is being debated now is whether the council should be allowed to draft in non-members to avoid an invidious backlog of cases; the elected and appointed members of the council - not the teacher unions, council officers or Education Secretary - should decide whether it will actually do this.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today