Missing the goal

10th November 2006 at 00:00
Judith Mabbott Sheffield

"Under-fives too slow to catch on" (TES, November 3)? What a way to refer to children! The piece berates youngsters for being unable to achieve many of the learning goals in the foundation stage profile. In these pages, Ted Wragg slated the profile, and your paper has run pieces explaining how many of the goals have been set too high - comparable to level 1 of the key stage 1 attainment targets. Much better to celebrate what children can and do achieve, at an appropriate level, when oral language and PSHE are taught through the prescribed, broad, play-based curriculum - including reading, writing and calculating - for the foundation stage.

This puts children in a strong position to hit the targets of the next key stage at the appropriate time. Over-emphasis on these aspects at too early an age has no long-term benefit. It unbalances the curriculum and can lead to disaffection later on.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today