Modular A-levels: a positive change;Letter

4th June 1999 at 01:00
As a head of geography who has taught a modular A-level course since its inception, I was disappointed to see inspectors talk about arts subjects as the ones likely to lose depth (TES, May 14).

The success of the Edexcel syll-abus B suggests that they must be classifying geography as a science: how reassuring. Stretching the brightest students is down to the teacher and not a fault of the course. Many of our very able students perform to a high standard and go on to find further success in higher education.

The module produced for our course in the form of a decision-making exercise is anything but poorly designed. Every time it appears in the exam room, invigilators have told me how exciting and challenging it looks.

When will inspectors stop looking for the negative aspects of education? Many of the forthcoming changes to post-16 education can only further improve the system.

Gary Davies

Head of Geography

Whitby Community College

North Yorkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today