Module ban isn't playing fair

9th September 2011 at 01:00

The problem with the Government's diktat ending the new modular GCSEs ("Entering borderline pupils early for modular GCSEs was like a Shakespearean farce - but less funny", 26 August) is that it fails to recognise that exams are not a homogeneous species.

Not all subjects are best examined with a terminal written paper. Assessment has come a long way since politicians sat their GCEs. More practical subjects like art, drama and dance often involve an exam that lasts many hours, spread over days or weeks.

The current modular exam is the most rigorous I have worked on. The use of distinctive modules allows the candidates to demonstrate a greater depth of knowledge and breadth of skills.

And, incidentally, resits are not a feasible option in such practical, often group-based, exams.

David Cross, Teacher and examiner, Leicester.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today