Money being wasted on an unfair and unreliable system

23rd June 1995 at 01:00
It is perhaps unsurprising that I found the contributions by John Green and Andrew Watts to the English Extra (TES, June 9) smacked of an apologia on behalf of vested interests -they are, after all both heavily involved in the business of ensuring that the Government's tests are "bedded in". I must say that both articles failed to convince me of the alleged merits of the national tests.

The moderation system described by John Green appears to be very similar to that which was used to guarantee standards for coursework. However, feedback to pupils will be limited to a series of ticks in red ink and marks for each question. This seems rather paltry compared with the marginal comments and summary comment that most pupils are used to with coursework. How such a snapshot test could really be used for "diagnostic" purposes I cannot imagine.

Andrew Watts was more discerning about the benefits of teacher assessment but seemed to go astray on the issue of reliability. Any single snapshot test is unreliable, no matter how much trialling it has had. Only a series of tests over a period of time can be considered truly reliable in the sense that they can average out misleading variations in performance. I am not suggesting that pupils should be condemned to a treadmill of national tests - rather that properly moderated coursework would be a much better guide to pupils' achievement.

Neither is standardisation of test content a guarantee of reliable results on a national basis as standardised tests can unintentionally discriminate against particular groups of pupils. On a national basis standards should be monitored by sampling: it is a more manageable and appropriate method of establishing whether levels of achievement are rising or failing.

What I would not dispute is John Green's comment that "the whole process is a massive undertaking". It is a pity that the resources of time and money which are being poured into this process are not being better spent on a fairer and more reliable system.

ANDY GIBBONS Organiser Campaign for Raising Standards in English 136 Trevelyan Road London SW17

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today