Money for exam results is 'corrupt';Letter

16th April 1999 at 01:00
DAVID Blunkett is right when he says it is a teacher's duty to get good exam results for their pupils.

He is wrong if he believes that this is a teacher's only duty. They also have a duty to the overall intellectual development of their pupils and to promote their interests as individuals.

All good teachers at one time or another have given priority to these other two obligations over the obligation to secure good exam results. Any financial incentive which provides an inducement to the contrary is a corrupt practice. Mr Blunkett should be careful before he describes strike action as "daft". For many honourable teachers the alternative is likely to be resignation.

Earl Russell History Department King's College, Strand, London WC2

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now