More competition, but who wins?

6th August 2010 at 01:00

As your leading article says, competition between schools as a key means of "driving up" standards, is intensifying ("Competition has a role but must be kept in check", July 30). Yet the evidence supporting this push is flimsy. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, in its report on the pupil premium, reviewed international research and concluded that, "Despite the numerous studies available, there is no definitive evidence for the effects of school competition". They added that, "The provision of new schools has the potential to increase segregation in schools".

The constant structural changes designed to promote competition are distracting, costly and divisive. They are also founded on an unproven assumption. Isn't it time for more grown-up policy-making?

Professor Ron Glatter, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today