More competition, but who wins?

6th August 2010 at 01:00

As your leading article says, competition between schools as a key means of "driving up" standards, is intensifying ("Competition has a role but must be kept in check", July 30). Yet the evidence supporting this push is flimsy. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, in its report on the pupil premium, reviewed international research and concluded that, "Despite the numerous studies available, there is no definitive evidence for the effects of school competition". They added that, "The provision of new schools has the potential to increase segregation in schools".

The constant structural changes designed to promote competition are distracting, costly and divisive. They are also founded on an unproven assumption. Isn't it time for more grown-up policy-making?

Professor Ron Glatter, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now