More evidence on assessment

12th October 2012 at 01:00

I wonder if Smithmith (Online Opinion, 5 October) has missed the point? He claims Black and Wiliam's research into formative assessment does not "stack up". Yet Dunn and Malvenon, whom she cites, conclude: "The research discussed in Black and Wiliam's (1998) review and the other research discussed here does provide some support for the impact of formative assessment on student achievement. However, it provides greater support for the need to conduct research in which more efficient methodologies and designs will lead to more conclusive results and understanding of the impact of formative assessment and evaluation on student achievement."

Whether they are right or not, I think this proves the point I was making about the importance of evidence. So, Smithmith, what's your view on setting, from the research evidence?

Brian Boyd, University of Strathclyde.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today