More evidence on assessment

12th October 2012 at 01:00

I wonder if Smithmith (Online Opinion, 5 October) has missed the point? He claims Black and Wiliam's research into formative assessment does not "stack up". Yet Dunn and Malvenon, whom she cites, conclude: "The research discussed in Black and Wiliam's (1998) review and the other research discussed here does provide some support for the impact of formative assessment on student achievement. However, it provides greater support for the need to conduct research in which more efficient methodologies and designs will lead to more conclusive results and understanding of the impact of formative assessment and evaluation on student achievement."

Whether they are right or not, I think this proves the point I was making about the importance of evidence. So, Smithmith, what's your view on setting, from the research evidence?

Brian Boyd, University of Strathclyde.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now