'New' does not mean 'failing'

25th February 2005 at 00:00
Your article "The worst lesson I have ever seen", (TES Cymru, February 4) quotes Mr Bradley Albuery, presenting officer at a General Teaching Council for England disciplinary hearing, as saying that a teacher's lessons "were even below the standards of a newly-qualified teacher".

The article refers to a 51-year-old teacher whose best performance out of 12 lessons was 20 minutes graded satisfactory.

As an NQT myself, I recently underwent an external moderation in which I was observed by a member of the local advisoryinspection team. Aspects of my teaching were judged to be "excellent". Am I to assume that this means excellent in comparison to a failing teacher?

This unsubstantiated allegation from someone who should know better is alarming. Reports of this kind could cause serious concern for parents whose children are currently being taught by NQTs.

I wonder if the GTCE would approve of the implications of this comment.

Sian David

9 Tairehol, Penpedairheol

Hengoed, Caerphilly

more letters 25

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now