New policy a betrayal of those who cheered Blunkett

9th January 1998 at 00:00
David Blunkett's letter (TES, December 26) was an evasive, politically expedient reply to the report "Labour accused of U-turn on selection" (TES, December 12) because he could not deny that there has been a U-turn since the 1997 Labour conference. There he made it quite clear that schools would not be allowed to have partial selection; now we find out that no new partial selection by ability will be permitted.

No explanation is given for this change of policy which betrays all those who clapped and cheered him at the conference and in the country at large. Perhaps you will receive another letter from him which really puts the record straight?

IAN GASPER 108 Ilkley Road Burley-in-Wharfedale, West Yorkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today