No assistance;Letter

1st May 1998 at 01:00
The strange assumption behind the now defunct assisted places scheme was that private schools were inevitably better for bright children than maintained schools.

Recent research by Whitty, Edwards and Wigfall (TES, April 17) has been misinterpreted by your writer and fortunately cannot raise that dead horse. The authors say clearly that differences in academic outcome were largely due to the pupils' "incoming attributes" - that is to their home background.

They point to the real and broader problem of working-class failure, which is likely to be helped by smaller classes and better quality teaching materials.

The Conservatives had pledged pound;180 million to the scheme for this year, but Labour is now diverting it to lower class sizes. Research evidence from many sources supports this move and also indicates other ways of spending that money to give a far higher proportion of pupils with potential the chance of aiming for excellence.

Joan Freeman, 21 Montagu Square, London W1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today