No hostility to returnees in Essex;Letter

7th May 1999 at 01:00
THE front-page report (TES, April 23) claims that Essex is one of the 23 authorities highlighted by the Funding Agency for Schools on behalf of GM heads as being "either hostile to them or not delegating cash" We have been assured by the FAS that it is still working on its report, which has not yet been submitted to Government and which will not contain the comments identified.

The reports suggest that Essex is to spend pound;890,000 on an additional 40 staff to "service the GM sector" This is totally misleading. We are making additional provision this year of pound;897,000 to increase LEA staffing and capacity to deliver a whole range of changing responsibilities.

It takes account of the 27 per cent increase in the number of maintained schools as GMs return to the LEA sector. However, it also includes a significant range of other requirements.

The TES report creates the impression that Essex is one of a number of LEAs that are not delegating the appropriate level of cash to schools. For 19992000 we have retained less than we did in 199899.

Paul Lincoln

Essex County Council, Chelmsford

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today