No hostility to returnees in Essex;Letter

7th May 1999 at 01:00
THE front-page report (TES, April 23) claims that Essex is one of the 23 authorities highlighted by the Funding Agency for Schools on behalf of GM heads as being "either hostile to them or not delegating cash" We have been assured by the FAS that it is still working on its report, which has not yet been submitted to Government and which will not contain the comments identified.

The reports suggest that Essex is to spend pound;890,000 on an additional 40 staff to "service the GM sector" This is totally misleading. We are making additional provision this year of pound;897,000 to increase LEA staffing and capacity to deliver a whole range of changing responsibilities.

It takes account of the 27 per cent increase in the number of maintained schools as GMs return to the LEA sector. However, it also includes a significant range of other requirements.

The TES report creates the impression that Essex is one of a number of LEAs that are not delegating the appropriate level of cash to schools. For 19992000 we have retained less than we did in 199899.

Paul Lincoln

Essex County Council, Chelmsford

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now