No sympathy for management

16th November 2007 at 00:00
Cliche time, I'm afraid. Chickens coming home to roost, hoist by their own petard, and so on.

Isn't it amazing that people who should know better, such as your commentator Anne Pearson last week, are now complaining about the consequences of management restructuring and job-sizing? These were foreseeable and were indeed predicted, but let me just point out a couple of things.

First, the restructuring was not part of the teachers' agreement. It was done independently by the local authorities against the advice of unions and teachers generally. Second, the job-sizing process was inserted into the agreement at the insistence of the management side.Having been closer than most to job-sizing, I can assure readers that the toolkit for this "tried and tested HR tool" was not arrived at entirely scientifically and objectively. It was "tweaked" to produce pre-determined answers.

Management saw it as a means to cut salary costs and took no account of what was bound to happen, because they do not understand how education really works.

Let them get on with it now, but they shouldn't expect any sympathy.

Bill Cooper, Highfield Circle, Kinross.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today