No value in vague levels

27th October 2000 at 01:00
HOW exciting it will be to start a new school and learn the same old stuff learnt in primary school. Labs with Bunsen burners and exciting prospects which can't be used because the Government has told teachers to hammer home the old stuff.

Doesn't David Blunkett realise that "level" descriptors are huge, vague, imposed millstones that have been given pseudo-credence by being quantified. I defy anyone to spot the difference between a pupil at the top end of a level 3 and the bottom end of a level 4. Exams for primary "failures" will force secondaries to have "remedialsets" from the word go, so preventing a fresh start for pupils. My, how to make them feel good!

There is more to educating children than making them jump through hoops, Mr Blunkett. Are you trying to squeeze in as much change as you possibly can before the General Teaching Council has a chance to consult the profession?

Is it this year or next you want us to produce human sausages who are all better than average?

Martin Scotchmer

Science teacher and a member of the General Teaching Council


Hinton St George


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today