Not enough meat

28th September 2007 at 01:00
Higher English has come under the spotlight again with the education convener of Scotland's largest teaching union calling for the writing element to be beefed up, and headteachers launching an inquiry into pupils' grades not matching teachers' estimates.

Larry Flanagan, convener of the education committee of the Educational Institute of Scotland and principal teacher of English at Hillhead High in Glasgow, feels the Inter-mediate 1 and 2 and Higher English exams have too great a focus on close reading and critical reading.

The format of the exam needs to be re-examined by the Scottish Qualifications Authority, he says, as the Higher pass mark tends to hover around 45 per cent lower than many other subjects. Significantly, however, there are thousands of candidates who are "bunched" around the pass mark, so a mark one way or another can make the difference between a pass or fail in one of the most crucial exams.

"The SQA has had to drop the pass mark every year since Higher Still came in so something is not quite right if they are not reaching 50 per cent year after year," said Mr Flanagan.

He believes the narrow focus of the exam is largely to blame and argues that if there was a greater focus on writing, there would also be a better spread of marks.

Mr Flanagan's headteacher, Ken Cunningham, chaired a review of Higher English in 2001 which recommended that creative writing form 20 per cent of the exam. However, the proposal was rejected because the SQA wanted Higher English to be made up of two 90-minute papers, mirroring other exams, believes Mr Flanagan. The option of a folio element was not accepted by the exams body because of fears over plagiarism.

The Headteachers' Association of Scotland, meanwhile, is carrying out a survey of its members because of concerns over an apparent unpredictability of Higher English results.

Carole Ford, head of Kilmarnock Academy and convener of the HAS education committee, said members had reported that not only did they have pupils who were under-performing compared to departmental expectations, but they had others who were getting much better passes than predicted.

A spokesman for the SQA said the authority was content with the robustness of its marking, but would look closely at any submission made by HAS.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now