Numbers game

14th April 1995 at 01:00
The editorial "Weighing the facts" (TES, March 31) following publication of the Audit Commission's local authority league tables just will not do.

Praying in aid the supposed success of WeightWatchers said it all. The public weighing characteristic of that organisation can achieve short-term change but wastage rate is high and ability to achieve long-term reduction doubtful.

The answer is not to make performance indicators more comprehensive.

There should be as few as possible - say not more than five - and they should exist within a context which does not demean.

What a mean-spirited, Gradgrindish view of our work would develop from an obsession with numbers. A few critical numbers are needed but within a renewed concept of public service.

Those who work in the public service need an incentive to battle on in increasingly difficult circumstances. Knocking a few percentage points off an unfavourable performance indicator, among a mass of other numbers, is unlikely to be enough.

Let us give those who work in the public service a reason to lift their heads.


41 Barnes View


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today