NUT unprincipled about threshold

9th February 2001 at 00:00
In response to the teacher who failed to cross the threshold (Talkback, January 12), I'm not sure whether I have any sympathy for him. From the start, anyone with any sense knew that the threshold was divisive. All those who did not like it but entered have contributed to a substantial pay difference between themselves and their colleagues.

These teachers entered this lottery becase the NUT told them to go for it. Here lies the truly unprincipled (but cosy) group who, 12 months ago, were adamant this lottery was not going to happen. The union executive thereby isolated a group of workers, leaving them open to attack by their employers. Yes, I do have sympathy with those "failed" teachers, but what do we do now?

C L Cheetham, Thornbury, Bradford

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today