Obfuscation's fine, it's the inspections

14th January 2000 at 00:00
CHRIS Woodhead attacks "windy rhetoric", "self-indulgent nonsense" and "wacky theorising". Wouldn't we all?

In my experience, teachers are well able to cut through "pseudo-academic obfuscation". What they find more difficult to overcome is the depression and distraction of inappropriate forms of externally imposed standards and inspection procedures.

What fascinates me about Woodhead and his position as chief inspecor of schools, is the evidence he uses to judge his influence on the educative processes in which teachers "initiate the young into those aspects of our culture upon which their (and our) humanity depends". Could the chief inspector direct us to the evidence which shows and explains how he has influenced the humanity of anyone, including himself?

Jack Whitehead

School of Education

University of Bath

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today