Oddly Enough - Spit without polish

29th August 2008 at 01:00

If a teacher spits at their principal, is it a legitimate act of critical expression? The courts in Italy have been giving this question weighty consideration.

A teacher, known only as Antonino R, argued at an appeals court in Palermo this month that he had been justified in spitting three times in the direction of his female principal. He claimed his action was an expression of his opinion about her "oppressive behaviour".

He also said his spit could not have reached her because the heated argument which led to the incidents had left his mouth dry.

However, the judges upheld a ruling that he had acted improperly. It was "irrelevant" whether or not the spit had reached the principal, they said, or whether his dry mouth made his action more problematic.

They also decided that spitting was not a legitimate form of critical expression. You have been warned.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today