Oddly Enough - Spit without polish

29th August 2008 at 01:00

If a teacher spits at their principal, is it a legitimate act of critical expression? The courts in Italy have been giving this question weighty consideration.

A teacher, known only as Antonino R, argued at an appeals court in Palermo this month that he had been justified in spitting three times in the direction of his female principal. He claimed his action was an expression of his opinion about her "oppressive behaviour".

He also said his spit could not have reached her because the heated argument which led to the incidents had left his mouth dry.

However, the judges upheld a ruling that he had acted improperly. It was "irrelevant" whether or not the spit had reached the principal, they said, or whether his dry mouth made his action more problematic.

They also decided that spitting was not a legitimate form of critical expression. You have been warned.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now