Ofsted 'purple prose' under attack

13th May 2005 at 01:00
Claims by the Office for Standards in Education about the positive effects of specialist schools are not justified by the watchdog's own research, according to a leading academic.

Ron Glatter, a visiting professor at the Open university and Warwick university, said there seemed little to back up several of the inspectorate's findings, including an assertion that specialist schools did not disadvantage neighbouring non-specialists. Professor Glatter has suggested that Ofsted's eagerness to praise the schools raises questions about its independence, as the scheme to expand specialist schools has strong support from ministers.

Ofsted published a broadly positive report on specialist schools in February, which said the status was a catalyst for improvement.

In a statement promoting the study, the inspectorate said that it had carried out a survey which "found no evidence that other schools located nearby were disadvantaged by having a specialist school in the area".

Professor Glatter said he had been surprised to find no details of the survey in the published study.

He contacted the watchdog and obtained a short report giving details of the survey of 60 specialist schools and its findings.

It said that there was "not sufficient evidence" to indicate whether or not the schools and their neighbours were improving at different rates at GCSE level.

Professor Glatter said: "That has a very different implication to the statement in the release. In fact, there is evidence in the main report that non-specialists which are neighbours of specialist schools have a lower level of attainment than non-specialists do nationally."

Professor Glatter said that he had been struck by the "purple prose" written by David Bell, chief inspector, about specialist schools, which he said would not have been out of place in a minister's speech.

"There still seems a big question about how independent his organisation really is," Professor Glatter said.

An Ofsted spokeswoman stressed that it was an independent organisation.

Although its survey had been inconclusive about rates of improvement at GCSE, it had found that non-specialists which were close to specialists had similar levels of attainment to others.

The Ofsted report also highlighted that more than half of specialists had failed to meet GCSE targets in their chosen subjects.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today