OFSTED's flawed methodology

21st November 1997 at 00:00
David Taylor's letter about the re-inspection of universityschool primary teacher training (TES, November 14) creates an elaborate smokescreen.

Of course universityschool partnerships have to operate approved quality control mechanisms to judge the competency of individuals. And yes, it is vitally important that only those with high levels of competence are licensed to teach.

But crucially, his letter neglects to mention the newly-adopted Office for Standards in Education methodology for judging teacher training partnerships.

This methodology is flawed. To demand "perfect" agreement between a partnership's assessment of middle-graded individuals and the assessment of the OFSTEDobserver is naive.

For the partnership to be threatened with failure because the grades of one or two individuals are not in exact agreement is unjustifiable.

Professor Peter Mortimore


Institute of Education

University of London, London WC1

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now