One vital debate

26th January 2007 at 00:00
I read with interest the contrasting views of Peter Wilby and Sean Lang in your comment pages (TES, January 19). I almost completely adhere to the first, but am at odds with the second.

Of course children need a knowledge of history and an ability to learn from the past. But, as with many other "traditional" subjects, too great an emphasis on the irrelevant and boring destroys the "love of learning". The need to accede to the demands of academics will simply not engage the majority.

Understandably, teachers are fed up with change after so many doomed initiatives. Even so, if we hope to compete with emerging nations and we believe children's lives should be fulfilled, there is surely one vital debate: how, what and why we teach our children. These are the main criteria by which our generation will be judged. Let us work towards a wholesale review, with implementation to follow.

Andy Dukes, The Wey Valley school and sports college, Weymouth, Dorset

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today