Our right to special schools

1st July 2005 at 01:00
As the father of a child with special needs I read Mark Vaughan's letter on Warnock and inclusion with interest.

Being at the consumer end of an educational philosophy leads one to some sceptical interpretations. It seems to me that many arguments around inclusion are mired in talk of human rights seen only from the perspective of those who take the intellectual and ethical high ground rather than recognising that any good idea can be misused and even abused.

I would like to focus on two points from Mr Vaughan's letter. He writes of the disabled adults who describe themselves as "special school survivors": we are creating a new cohort of disabled adults who will be describing themselves as inclusion survivors.

Sadly it cannot be "taken as read that those who advocate inclusion want only good inclusion". It seems to me that to introduce inclusion without extensive and sustained training and resources, is either naive, or worse, seen as an economic bonus for the special needs budget.

As a parent of a vulnerable child I want choices for my child, as indeed she does too. The inclusion principle applied to all denies us that human right.

Steve Chinn

Klive Somerset

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today