Our scrutiny was called constructive and valuable

20th December 1996 at 00:00
From Mike Howell

I take exception to my photograph being used to illustrate letters about "conflicting advice from Inspectors and SCAA" (TES, December 6). As a local education authority inspector in Solihull, my main task is to offer advice and support to schools, helping them, I trust, to make sense out of national policy that is sometimes conflicting and frequently difficult to manage.

Even more irritating, the photograph of me that you used, and which must have been in your archive, was taken when I and Solihull colleagues conducted one of the last of our local education authority inspections. These were rigorous, but were regarded by our schools as constructive and valuable. They ceased to happen when large amounts of money were withdrawn from the LEA to set up the Office for Standards in Education.

I hope you will publish this correction and ensure that archive photographs are not used in this misleading way in future.

MIKE HOWELL General Inspector, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

We apologise to Mr Howell for using his photograph in the wrong context - Editor.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today