Party line on governors should be abolished;Letter

19th March 1999 at 00:00
You report (TES, March 5) that, in appointing local authority governors, some councils are no longer limiting appointees to those with formal party-political affiliation.

Government long ago should have stopped this limitation because the duty of all governors is to their school: it is clear that there are no delegates, only representatives.

Equally there is no justification for the withdrawal of council members from governing bodies simply because party-political power has changed in a council. This logically invalid procedure has arisen because of an absence of understanding of terms of reference by councillors. Such practice by local authorities has long stopped excellent people both becoming and continuing as governors.

When a local authority governor fails to attend meetings of a governing body there is a general sanction currently applicable to all. But when an authority has failed to appoint by the first meeting of an academic year, then the Government should empower governing bodies to fill the vacancy before the following meeting.

Dr JC Gibbings

University of Liverpool

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now