Pay or not to pay

27th February 2009 at 00:00

I am pleased The TES continues to cover the teachers' pay issue but surprised that you describe the NUT's pay proposals as seeking a "bonus payment" for teachers ("NUT demands 10 per cent pay hike plus cash bonus", TES, February 20).

Teachers' pay increases since 2004 have been below inflation every year. In real terms, teachers are 6 per cent worse off - taking Pounds 1,000 a year from NQTs and much more from older teachers. This situation should never have been allowed to occur. The NUT is seeking an increase from September 2009 which reverses that pay cut and puts teachers' pay back to where it was in 2004. Hardly a "bonus payment".

Further steps will then be needed to make teachers' pay competitive for the longer term. Our submission to the School Teachers' Review Body and accompanying research shows teachers start on lower pay than in other professions and then fall further behind.

Graduates' interest in teaching is in long-term decline. Pay is a part of the reason.

We cannot rely on the recession to improve matters - previous experience shows that when the economy improves, graduates will again look elsewhere.

Tim Harrison, London regional secretary, National Union of Teachers.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today