Pay plan rejected

22nd March 1996 at 00:00
Governors alone should be able to decide what a head has to achieve to earn extra salary points, the National Association of Governors and Managers says in response to a Government proposal that would compel heads and governors jointly to agree such targets from September.

If a governing body has to agree performance criteria with the head, then he or she effectively has an "armlock" on the governors, NAGM says.

Jointly-agreed performance criteria were suggested by the teachers' pay review body after complaints that heads were exploiting the merit pay procedures. Teacher unions alleged heads had "top sliced" school budgets last year by Pounds 12 million in extra pay while few teachers receive performance pay.

At present governors are required to consider whether heads and deputies have shown "sustained overall performance which appreciably exceeds that normally expected" when reviewing salaries. But locally agreed performance criteria, effectively determined by the head, would be just as poor a check on unjustifiable salary increases, NAGM argues.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now