Pay plan rejected

22nd March 1996 at 00:00
Governors alone should be able to decide what a head has to achieve to earn extra salary points, the National Association of Governors and Managers says in response to a Government proposal that would compel heads and governors jointly to agree such targets from September.

If a governing body has to agree performance criteria with the head, then he or she effectively has an "armlock" on the governors, NAGM says.

Jointly-agreed performance criteria were suggested by the teachers' pay review body after complaints that heads were exploiting the merit pay procedures. Teacher unions alleged heads had "top sliced" school budgets last year by Pounds 12 million in extra pay while few teachers receive performance pay.

At present governors are required to consider whether heads and deputies have shown "sustained overall performance which appreciably exceeds that normally expected" when reviewing salaries. But locally agreed performance criteria, effectively determined by the head, would be just as poor a check on unjustifiable salary increases, NAGM argues.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today