Performance pay? Fine, but MPs go first ..

19th November 2010 at 00:00

I would be more inclined to contemplate performance-related pay if the claimed transparency applied equally to politicians ("Gove bid to link performance to pay ires unions and irritates sceptics", November 12).

It would be easy to compile tables whereby we could evaluate our MPs' performance compared to other MPs: how often they address the house, how many days they attend Parliament, and what other "extra-curricular" activities they undertake for the benefit of their constituents, not to mention how much they cost us in expenses.

But I can hear the cries of those politicians who perform less well: "You cannot assess the value and worth of an MP from random and sometimes irrelevent criteria!" Yes ...

Tony Mills, Eaglescliffe, Stockton-on-Tees.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now