The personal is political

4th October 2013 at 01:00

John Roberts, the founder of Edapt, writes that the organisation "gives teachers a union alternative ... without the political rhetoric" ("Putting teachers before politics", Letters, 27 September). Does this mean that Edapt will not engage with the proposed changes to teachers' pay and conditions?

Furthermore, since "the vast majority of teachers join unions primarily, or solely, for individual support", can he guarantee that, when these issues do become "individual", teachers will be able to rely on Edapt representation?

I originally joined a union for legal representation, as a minimum guarantee. I devote my working week to ensuring that members get that personal, professional support, whatever "fragmentation of representation" is alleged by a predatory financial organisation that chooses to ignore the significant cooperation evident in current industrial action.

Value for money? The NUT and NASUWT teaching unions are worth every penny.

Fred Greaves, Division secretary, Surrey NUT.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today