Phonics debate continues to split opinion

1st April 2011 at 01:00

In his letter published on 25 March, Professor Norman Thomas wrote: "We read for context and understanding. The phonics experiment in Scotland did not get good results on that."

Wrong. The results for reading comprehension in Clackmannanshire, following synthetic phonics teaching, were remarkable. At the end of primary school, children from an area of economic deprivation scored three months above chronological age.

Elizabeth Nonweiler, Teach to Read, Berkshire.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now