Phonics debate continues to split opinion

1st April 2011 at 01:00

In his letter published on 25 March, Professor Norman Thomas wrote: "We read for context and understanding. The phonics experiment in Scotland did not get good results on that."

Wrong. The results for reading comprehension in Clackmannanshire, following synthetic phonics teaching, were remarkable. At the end of primary school, children from an area of economic deprivation scored three months above chronological age.

Elizabeth Nonweiler, Teach to Read, Berkshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today