Plan to link heads' salaries to targets

6th February 1998 at 00:00
Heads and deputies' salaries could be directly linked to their school meeting official targets, the review body has suggested, writes Frances Rafferty.

In a consultative document the review body will examine how an element of salary progression might be linked to the targets envisaged in the White Paper Excellence in Schools. This would help governing bodies set performance criteria and help tackle regional disparities.

In practice heads and deputies in London and the South-east are more likely to be awarded additional spine points than their colleagues elsewhere.

It admits that heads who do well are currently only rewarded by schools that can afford it.

David Blunkett, the Education Secretary, had expressed concern about the supply and quality of primary heads and asked whether present pay levels were enough to attract good candidates. But the review body said the recruitment position for primaries was not much different than that for secondaries.

It notes that governors are often not confident about dealing with heads and deputies' pay, and the Office for Standards in Education doubted the ability of governors to set performance targets and decide salary rises.

The review body said it approved of local education authorities which set up independent governors' forums and said extra training on dealing with pay should be offered.

The report supports the view of headteacher unions that issues such as non-contact time are management concerns and, while it accepts excessive workloads can be a problem, it says nationally prescribed limits are not the correct approach.

Mr Blunkett had asked Tony Vineall, chairman of the review body, to strengthen the head's role on dealing with poorly-performing teachers. Mr Blunkett had suggested making it a head's duty to consider the performance of all staff and to report to the governors.

The review body said: "The head should keep the governing body informed but without disclosing details of individual cases; and he should report to the chair of governors on the professional development of all staff."

It was concerned that information given about individuals could be used against them in incompetence or dismissal procedures. It recommended a statutory duty on headsto report annually to the chair of governors on the professional development of all staff and to ensure effective measures to deal with incompetent teachers. As a result, chairs of governors should not be participants in dismissal procedures as such information may be prejudicial.

Salaries Policies, page 29

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today