Plenty of scope for excitement

11th September 1998 at 01:00
In her article, Helen Flatley refers somewhat vaguely to constraints on science practical work brought about by institutions and institution-generated paperwork.

It is not at all clear which institutions are the culprits in this but she should not extrapolate from her experience to assume that such an approach is widely supported.

The Association for Science Education has for many years advised on safety in science, always in the context of retaining, if not increasing, interesting and exciting practical activities.

If she would therefore read the association's safety publications, or indeed the Department for Education and Employment's Safety in science education, Helen would discover that practical work with lungs or the sampling of human cheek cells is perfectly acceptable, without the need for any unreasonable paperwork, providing a few simple precautions are taken.

Safety in science education is important. There is no excuse for exposing students or teachers to unnecessary risks. However this does not translate into removing the fun from practical work.

Phil Bunyan Chair of the ASE safeguards in science committee 13 Redthorn Way Claypole, Newark, Notts

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today