Points of view

11th November 2005 at 00:00
* Your piece on the impact of school design on learning ("Ferrari facilities don't raise standards", TES, October 28) missed out key findings of the Newcastle university research - and flies in the face of our experience.

The review found that "it is the extent to which, and ways in which, school users are engaged in the design process that determines the success or failure of the resulting design". In other words, engage staff and pupils in the design process and you come up with something that works.

The review goes on to say how difficult it is to assess the impact of environments on attainment, behaviour and attendance, and more, focused, research is needed.

We echo that call, but in the meantime we have worked with many heads, teachers and children who will tell you that to teach and learn in a beautiful, fit-for-purpose school means better quality of life - and better results.

Ty Goddard School WorksDownstream Building 1 London Bridge, London SE1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today