Poison perks;Leading Article;Opinion

1st October 1999 at 01:00
THE London Oratory is not the first maintained school to ask parents to offset unwelcome cuts, even if it has been funded in recent years at levels most heads only dream of. Nor will parents at the Oratory be the first gladly to pay what to many is a relatively small premium in order to enjoy the sort of exclusivity, staffing, facilities and extra-curricular activities they would otherwise have to spend thousands on in the private sector, even if the governing body has kept from them the information required by law in its annual report on how it spends the school's money.

The Oratory is not the only former grant-maintained school to be feeling the squeeze begun by the last government after double-funding was criticised by the Public Accounts Committee and tightened by the loss of special grants following a change in status. But rather than fight to retain the perks which poisoned the well of self-government they ought to lobby for adequate funding for all schools.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now