Post-16 pudding

23rd February 2001 at 00:00
It has long been apparent that, after 16, the larger, more specialist providers tend to be not only cheaper but also more effective. One in three small sixth forms is not cost-effective according to the Office for Standards in Education. And a quarter have a "very restricted" curriculum.

Successive governments ducked this issue. Tampering with the ethos and character of prestigious 11-to-18 schools by removing their academic sixth forms was bound to provoke an outcry. Some local authorities bit the bullet, but strategic direction was virtually abandoned when colleges were made autonomous in 193.

Labour's new Learning and Skills Council now promises a return to 16-to-19 planning. The Government presumably hopes it will also insulate ministers from unpopular rationalisations. But the real test will be whether students benefit from greater efficiency and effectiveness, wider choice and more appropriate courses.

The proof of this quangocratic pudding is in the eating. But with attention increasingly focusing on a 14-to-19 curriculum and a bigger role for vocational learning in schools, it is hard to see how a planning and funding discontinuity at 16 makes much sense.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today