1st September 2000 at 01:00
PAUL Kelley's comment (TES, August 18) is long on rhetoric, but notably short on facts to support his belief that Laura Spence failed to get a place at Oxford because of anti-comprehensive school prejudice. Quite simply, all he nees to do is give us the name of the candidate who got Laura's place, and explain how that other candidate was worse. If he cannot put up, he should shut up.

John Duffield

64 Spring Grove



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today