Privatisation by any other name...

6th October 2000 at 01:00
NICE try, New Labour, but the idea that putting the London borough of Camden on the list of those who can step in to run privatised education authorities, and then claiming that if they do, it isn't really privatisation is not a starter (TES, September 22).

Agreed, one hopes, Camden knows a bit more about the subject than, say, Group 4, another shortlisted concern. However, the contractual arrangement is exatly the same.

This means that, for example in Haringey where Camden is helping out, that Camden's council taxpayers will benefit from the profit made.

Good news for the residents of Camden, less so for those in Haringey who face not only privatisation but also subsidising another borough out of their council tax.

Keith Flett

Haringey Against Privatisation

Tottenham, London N17

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today